NO. 70927-5-1 THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, ERVIN COX, Appellant
![Missouri v. Frye, 566 U.S. 134, 132 S.Ct. 1399, 182 L.Ed.2d 379 (2012): Case Brief Summary | Quimbee Missouri v. Frye, 566 U.S. 134, 132 S.Ct. 1399, 182 L.Ed.2d 379 (2012): Case Brief Summary | Quimbee](https://embed-ssl.wistia.com/deliveries/67ab343c5c1fe12bae5a03f1550668897c6d4a85.jpg?image_crop_resized=750x422)
Missouri v. Frye, 566 U.S. 134, 132 S.Ct. 1399, 182 L.Ed.2d 379 (2012): Case Brief Summary | Quimbee
Episode 2: Present Fight the Power: The Evolution of Prosecutorial Discretion Music ABBY: Hey everyone, welcome to the second ep
![ND Expert: Real significance of landmark ruling on plea deals | News | Notre Dame News | University of Notre Dame ND Expert: Real significance of landmark ruling on plea deals | News | Notre Dame News | University of Notre Dame](https://news.nd.edu/assets/11963/eck_rel.jpg)